Johnson & Johnson ordered to pay man $8bn over breast growth

Johnson & Johnson ordered to pay man $8bn over breast progress



Johnson & Johnson signPicture copyright
Getty Pictures

US drug agency Johnson & Johnson has been informed to pay $8bn (£6.6bn) in punitive damages to a person over claims he was not warned that an antipsychotic drug may result in breast progress.

A Philadelphia jury made the award to Nicholas Murray, 26, whose case was one in all 1000’s pending within the state.

His legal professionals argued that J&J subsidiary Janssen put “income over sufferers” in advertising the drug Risperdal.

J&J will attraction the ruling, which it stated was “grossly disproportionate”.

The US big can also be going through court docket challenges over vaginal mesh implants and child powder allegedly tainted with asbestos. That is along with an ongoing authorized battle over its position within the US opioid dependancy disaster.

Earlier this 12 months, the corporate was ordered to pay $572m for its half in fuelling Oklahoma’s opioid dependancy disaster. It lately agreed to a $20.4m settlement with two counties within the US state of Ohio over claims it fuelled the disaster there.

The corporate’s mounting authorized payments have precipitated concern amongst some traders, however its earnings have remained robust.

In Risperdal lawsuit stated Mr Murray developed breasts after his docs started prescribing him the drug in 2003. A psychologist prescribed the drug after diagnosing him with autism spectrum dysfunction.

Risperdal is accredited for the remedy of schizophrenia and bipolar dysfunction, however docs can legally prescribe medication for any situation they see match.

The corporate stated it’s assured the ruling shall be overturned, and stated the court docket prevented their authorized crew from presenting “key proof” on the drug’s labelling.

J&J is going through a collection of complaints in state courts for failing to correctly warn of Risperdal’s unintended effects, together with in Pennsylvania, California and Missouri.

A jury in 2015 awarded Mr Murray $1.75m after discovering the corporate was negligent in failing to warn shoppers of the dangers.

A state appeals court docket upheld the decision in final 12 months, however decreased it to $680,000.


Like it? Share with your friends!

0 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Send this to a friend